Case 6013374/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Amanada Whiteland-Smith v Citizens Advice Solent East — 2026
- Case reference
- 6013374/2025
- Decision date
- 1 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K. Richardson Tribunal
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- P. English, L. Wakeman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Amanada Whiteland-Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Amanada Whiteland-Smith, appearing in person, brought a complaint described as 'unfair constructive dismissal' against Citizens Advice Solent East. The hearing took place at Southampton on 10-11 March 2026 before Employment Judge K. Richardson with Tribunal Members P. English and L. Wakeman, and the respondent was represented by Miss Cho, counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint and described it as 'not well conceived'. The decision note states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of 'unfair constructive dismissal' was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.