Case 6013489/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Gwendoline Price v Home Helpers – Commercial & Domestic Cleaners Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6013489/2025
- Decision date
- 12 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elizabeth Gibson
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Gwendoline Price
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Elizabeth Gibson, sitting alone by CVP on 12 February 2026, found that the Claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The Tribunal held that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages in the period between December 2024 and 24 March 2025.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £261.00, being the gross sum deducted. The judgment records that the Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance on that sum.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the Tribunal's standard practice. The written record was sent to the parties on 27 February 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period between December 2024 and 24 March 2025. | Upheld | — | £261 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £261
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.