Case 6013573/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Wooster v Jabbar Mumtaz and 2 others — 2026
- Case reference
- 6013573/2024
- Decision date
- 5 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd Appearances
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Wooster
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims against Jabbar Mumtaz and Shore Side Associates Limited were dismissed on withdrawal. The Tribunal found that Wooster was unfairly dismissed by Asturias Solutions Limited. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment does not record the Tribunal's underlying factual findings or legal reasoning.
Wooster was awarded a basic award of £639.54 and a compensatory award of £104.78, amounting in total to £744.32. No injury-to-feelings award or interest was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claims against First Respondent Jabbar Mumtaz and Third Respondent Shore Side Associates Limited were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was upheld against Second Respondent Asturias Solutions Limited. | Upheld | — | £744 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £744
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £640
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £105
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.