Case 6013575/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Alison Ames v Ultrasafe UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013575/2024
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Alison Ames
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 7 April 2025 before Employment Judge G. King, with both parties appearing in person, the tribunal recorded only two dispositive orders. The Claimant’s claim for redundancy payments was dismissed by way of withdrawal.
The tribunal also recorded that the Claimant’s claim in respect of notice pay was dismissed by way of withdrawal. No substantive reasons, liability findings, or monetary awards are set out in the written record provided, and the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim in respect of redundancy payments was dismissed by way of withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim in respect of notice pay was dismissed by way of withdrawal. The text does not specify any further legal basis, so this is treated as a contractual notice pay claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.