Case 6013581/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ahir v Scot Group Ltd t/a Switch Car Rental and Thrifty Car and Van Rental — 2024
- Case reference
- 6013581/2024
- Decision date
- 25 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hallen Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ahir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Ahir brought an interim relief application arising out of the termination of his employment. The tribunal heard the application remotely on 30 October 2024 before Employment Judge Hallen. No oral evidence was called; the parties relied on documents, witness statements that were not considered orally, and oral submissions.
The tribunal applied the interim relief test under s.128(3) Employment Rights Act 1996 and considered whether it was likely that a tribunal would ultimately find that the reason for dismissal was the protected-disclosure reason in s.129(1)(a) ERA 1996. On the documentary material, the tribunal was not satisfied that the principal reason asserted by the claimant for dismissal was that he had made a protected disclosure.
In reaching that view, the tribunal noted that the claimant's grievance dated 18 September 2024 referred to a poor working relationship with another employee who was tasked with training him, together with a grievance about health and safety. The tribunal also noted that the co-employee lodged a counter-grievance on 23 September 2024 concerning the claimant's conduct towards her. The application for interim relief therefore failed, and the respondent was ordered to file its Response Form so that the claim could proceed to a preliminary hearing for further case management.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Application for interim relief under s.128 ERA 1996 failed because the tribunal was not satisfied that it was likely the claimant would ultimately prove dismissal for the protected-disclosure reason in s.129(1)(a) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.128(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.129(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.