Case 6013592/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Maryellen Wills Blackburn v Johann Scerri trading as Tiffin Tea Rooms — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013592/2024
- Decision date
- 18 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elizabeth Gibson
- Venue
- By Cloud Virtual Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Maryellen Wills Blackburn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMaryellen Wills Blackburn worked as a cook for Johann Scerri trading as Tiffin Tea Rooms from 4 December 2023 until 15 August 2024. Her only claim was for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 ERA 1996, arising from alleged underpayment in July and August 2024. The tribunal noted that neither side complied with the case management directions, so it relied mainly on the parties’ ET1 and ET3 statements and the documents emailed before and during the hearing.
The tribunal preferred the Claimant’s account that she was part-paid in cash as well as through the Respondent’s bank account. It relied on a note in the Claimant’s notebook referring to a bank payment and a cash payment, a WhatsApp message in which Ms Kenny appeared to accept that she had overlooked a cash payment, and inconsistencies in Ms Kenny’s oral evidence on whether cash payments had been made.
On the hours worked, the tribunal accepted that the Claimant used her notebook to record her shifts and found the July and August 2024 entries to be accurate, except that the Claimant had exaggerated the start time of some shifts by recording 8.30am or 8.45am rather than 9am. It found that in July 2024 she worked 82 hours and was paid for 39 hours on the payslip plus 18.5 hours in cash, leaving 24.5 hours unpaid. For August 2024, it found that she worked 44.25 hours and was paid for 36 hours, leaving 8.25 hours unpaid.
The tribunal therefore held that the Respondent unlawfully deducted wages from the Claimant in July and August 2024. It awarded £281.75 for July and £94.88 for August, making a total award of £376.63 gross, with the Claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages in July and August 2024. It calculated £281.75 for July and £94.88 for August, totalling £376.63. | Upheld | — | £377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £377
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 13(3) ERA 1996
- Part II ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.