Case 6013774/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Jeffreys v JD Fitness Group Limited RECONSIDERED — 2024
- Case reference
- 6013774/2024
- Decision date
- 3 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Povey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Jeffreys
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 03 October 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Povey decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On that basis, the Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £480.48 gross. The document is recorded as a reconsidered judgment approved by Employment Judge Povey on 9 February 2026 and sent to the parties on 18 February 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21/22 default judgment: respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £480
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.