Case 6013790/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. O Olubori v Jet2.com Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013790/2024
- Decision date
- 22 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. O Olubori
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant sought to amend his claim to add direct and indirect race discrimination complaints arising from the termination of his employment after issues concerning the documentation needed for an airside identification card. The Tribunal considered whether the proposed allegations were already in the claim form and, if not, whether an amendment should be allowed.
The Tribunal found that the claim form did not contain the proposed race discrimination claims. It refused the amendment application, taking account of delay, time limits, the balance of hardship, and its conclusion that the proposed direct and indirect race discrimination claims were weak and had little prospect of success.
Because the remaining pleaded matter was a general assertion of unfair treatment rather than a claim within the Tribunal's jurisdiction, the Tribunal struck out the remaining complaints under Rule 38(1)(a). The claim was therefore struck out in its entirety.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant applied to amend his claim to add direct race discrimination and indirect race discrimination. The Tribunal refused that amendment application, finding the proposed claims were out of time and had little prospect of success. | Other | Race | — |
| Other | The Tribunal determined that the claim form contained no claim of race discrimination and that what remained was a general assertion of unfair treatment over which the Tribunal had no jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 38(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.