Case 6013794/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Pain v Townscape Design Initiatives Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013794/2024
- Decision date
- 2 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Pain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 2 April 2025 before Employment Judge Corrigan, the tribunal held that Mr C Pain was entitled to redundancy pay from Townscape Design Initiatives Limited. The judgment records the award at £5,048 and orders the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant.
The tribunal found that the claimant had received the correct notice pay, so his claim for unpaid notice / unlawful deduction of wages for the remainder of the notice period was not well-founded and was dismissed. The claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No other monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,048 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned unpaid notice pay / unlawful deduction of wages for the remainder of the notice period; the tribunal found the claimant had received the correct notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,048
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.