Case 6013850/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sinnathamby Vinothan v Asda Express Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013850/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sinnathamby Vinothan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 January 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 8 October 2024 and 18 November 2024, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations in response. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Perry on 6 March 2025 and sent to the parties on 10 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text records only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment reasons. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The extracted judgment text records only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment reasons. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text records only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.