Case 6013889/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Deborah Robinson v Terrence Andrew Limited trading as Terrence Andrew Hairdressing — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013889/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Searley Representation
- Venue
- London East Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Deborah Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Deborah Robinson, brought complaints against her employer Terrence Andrew Limited trading as Terrence Andrew Hairdressing. The Respondent did not attend the hearing before Employment Judge Searley on 28 May 2025 at the London East Hearing Centre. The Tribunal first confirmed the proper name of the Respondent.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent was in breach of contract by dismissing the Claimant without notice, and the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. The Claimant's gross weekly pay was calculated as £137.28, and damages of £1,647.36 were awarded for the 12-week statutory notice period, using gross pay to reflect likely tax liability as Post Employment Notice Pay. The complaint in respect of holiday pay was also well-founded, the Respondent having failed to pay the Claimant in accordance with regulations 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and £337.70 was awarded.
The Tribunal further determined under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,500.64, calculated by reference to the date of redundancy (15 June 2024), the Claimant's age on that date (63), 17 years of service, and gross average weekly pay of £137.28.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay: Respondent dismissed Claimant without notice. £1,647.36 awarded as damages for 12 weeks statutory notice period, calculated using gross weekly pay of £137.28. | Upheld | — | £1,647 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. £337.70 awarded. | Upheld | — | £338 |
| Working time regulations | Working Time Regulations 1998 breach found in conjunction with holiday pay complaint; award captured under the holiday_pay claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment of £3,500.64 awarded under section 163 ERA 1996, calculated by reference to date of redundancy (15 June 2024), age 63, 17 years of service, and gross average weekly pay of £137.28. | Upheld | — | £3,501 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,486
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.