Case 6013903/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Guo v P.W. Trading Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013903/2025
- Decision date
- 30 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Guo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not submit an ET3 response and ultimately accepted the claims and amounts claimed. Regional Employment Judge Burgher therefore gave judgment by consent at the East London Hearing Centre on 30 August 2025, with the written judgment approved on 30 September 2025.
The Claimant's claims for unpaid salary for December 2024 and January 2025, unpaid accrued holiday pay, and unpaid business expenses each succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay a total of £4,562.44, comprising £3,631.92 for unpaid salary, £259.90 for unpaid accrued holiday pay, and £670.62 for unpaid business expenses.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid salary for December 2024 and January 2025; succeeded by consent. | Upheld | — | £3,632 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid accrued holiday pay; succeeded by consent. | Upheld | — | £260 |
| Breach of contract | Unpaid business expenses; succeeded by consent. | Upheld | — | £671 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,562
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.