Case 6013961/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M T Magora v Staff Resources Limited HELD AT/BY: Wrexham by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013961/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M T Magora
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M T Magora brought a claim that Staff Resources Limited had made unauthorised deductions from her wages. The hearing took place on 11 March 2025 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, with the Claimant absent and the Respondent represented by Mr N Tudor, Consultant.
The tribunal dismissed the claim. It found that the Respondent had already paid the Claimant £66.30 before the hearing, that this sum had been conceded in the Response as due to her, and that the Claimant had failed to prove any further sums had been deducted from her wages.
The tribunal also noted that the Claimant had not attended the hearing or provided an excuse for her non-attendance, and that she was in breach of case management orders in preparation for the hearing. The Respondent's sworn witness evidence and documentary evidence were accepted.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. It recorded that the Respondent had already paid £66.30 before the hearing, which it had conceded was due to the Claimant, but found that the Claimant had failed to prove any other deductions. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.