Case 6014050/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Callum Riley v Quantarverse Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6014050/2025
- Decision date
- 24 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Callum Riley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Findlay heard the case at Reading by CVP on 27 February 2026. The claimant, Callum Riley, appeared in person; the respondent, Quantarverse Limited, did not appear. The tribunal found the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £11,687.78 (gross).
The respondent's counterclaim, brought under article 4 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, was held not to be well founded and was dismissed. The claimant's claims against Michael Broby (also known as Chambers) were dismissed by consent upon withdrawal.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided with this record. The judgment was sent to the parties on 24 March 2026.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded; respondent ordered to pay £11,687.78 (gross). Respondent did not appear. | Upheld | — | £11,688 |
| Breach of contract | Respondent's counterclaim under article 4 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claimant's claims against Michael Broby (also known as Chambers) dismissed by consent upon withdrawal. Claim type not specified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,688
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- article 4 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.