Case 6014062/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Raczynska v Lena Lu Watford Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6014062/2025
- Decision date
- 26 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Raczynska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Gordon Walker, sitting alone at Norwich Employment Tribunal by CVP on 3 March 2026, heard a breach of contract claim brought by Ms K Raczynska against Lena Lu Watford Ltd. The claimant represented herself and the respondent was represented by Mr P Gardner, director. The judgment first amended the respondent's name to Lena Lu Watford Ltd.
The tribunal found that the claim of breach of contract was well founded and succeeded, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the agreed sum of £115.48. The claimant confirmed that the claim form contained no other claims.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested by either party at the hearing or in writing within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Tribunal recorded the claim as well founded and ordered payment of an agreed sum of £115.48. | Upheld | — | £115 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £115
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.