Case 6014207/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Dominic Tate v Chief Constable for Wiltshire — 2026
- Case reference
- 6014207/2024
- Decision date
- 26 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dominic Tate
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints against the Chief Constable for Wiltshire, including constructive unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The hearing took place at Southampton Employment Tribunal by CVP on 13 March 2026 before Employment Judge Salter.
The tribunal recorded that the constructive unfair dismissal complaint was presented out of time, in circumstances where it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time. It also recorded that the disability discrimination complaints were presented out of time and were not presented within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable.
The written record does not include fuller reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was presented out of time in circumstances where it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time. Written reasons are not included in the provided text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of discrimination arising from disability was presented out of time and not within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. Written reasons are not included in the provided text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was presented out of time and not within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. Written reasons are not included in the provided text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.