Case 6014259/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Jenkinson v 1.Nurture Childcare Services Limited 2.Pebbles Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014259/2024
- Decision date
- 23 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Jenkinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, heard by CVP in Manchester on 23 July 2025 before Employment Judge KM Ross, contains a single recorded finding. The tribunal found that Ms K Jenkinson was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 by reason of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and that she was disabled whilst employed by the respondent.
The extracted record does not set out any further liability findings, findings on specific discriminatory acts, or any remedy award. No reasons are provided in the extracted text beyond the disability-status finding.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text records only the s.6 Equality Act 2010 finding that the claimant was a disabled person by reason of ADHD and was disabled whilst employed. No separate discrimination act, liability analysis, or remedy is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.