Case 6014286/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mary McCartan-Cripps v Bupa Insurance Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6014286/2024
- Decision date
- 16 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mary McCartan-Cripps
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Feeney struck out Mary McCartan-Cripps's claim against BUPA Insurance Services Limited. On 29 May 2026, the Tribunal warned the claimant that it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued and it was no longer possible to hold a fair hearing. The claimant replied on 10 June 2026.
The Tribunal was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that striking out the claim accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The hearing listed for 3 to 7 August 2026 was cancelled. The judgment did not identify the underlying cause of action and recorded no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.