Case 6014297/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Lidia Mihalachi v UK FRESH BITES Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6014297/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lidia Mihalachi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 8 October 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Edmonds decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Lidia Mihalachi was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £205.92 in damages. It also found that UK Fresh Bites Ltd had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and awarded £411.84.
The total award was £617.76. The judgment states that the figures are gross and that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £206 |
| Holiday pay | Award made for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £412 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £618
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.