Case 6014305/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Taylor v ISS Facility Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014305/2024
- Decision date
- 30 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 24 February 2025 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders dated 18 October 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not respond to that warning letter. Employment Judge Camp found that the claimant's non-compliance with Tribunal orders and failure to communicate with the respondent and the Tribunal threatened the viability of the final hearing planned for June 2025. The judge considered that the claimant appeared to have abandoned the claim and exercised discretion to strike it out. The hearing listed for 17 and 18 June 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out; it does not specify the underlying claim type in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.