Case 6014323/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Mellor v Pod Developments Projects Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6014323/2024
- Decision date
- 16 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Mellor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,916.67.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,375.02. The judgment did not set out any further reasoning beyond those determinations.
The decision record also noted that the hearing listed for 6 and 7 August 2025 was cancelled. An accompanying interest notice explained the tribunal's interest procedure under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but no separate interest amount was awarded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,916.67 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,917 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,375.02. | Upheld | — | £4,375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,292
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.