Case 6014342/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Sahejpal v Elite Medical Staffing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014342/2024
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McGough Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Sahejpal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant was employed as CEO of Acton Banks Limited, a healthcare recruitment subsidiary of the Respondent, from January 2010 until his dismissal on 12 March 2025 following six months' notice. The Respondent initially denied liability but admitted unfair dismissal shortly before the hearing, which was then converted to a remedy hearing. The Tribunal heard evidence from the Claimant and from Mr Tom Purkis, a partner at Maven Capital Partners, the private equity investor in the ultimate parent company.
The Tribunal found that there was a 50% chance the Claimant would have been fairly dismissed for some other substantial reason (loss of trust and confidence) within six months had a fair procedure been followed. It applied no Polkey reduction to the first 26 weeks of loss but reduced the remaining 13 weeks by 50%. The Tribunal found that the Claimant did not cause or contribute to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct, so no reduction was made on that basis.
The Tribunal held that the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures applied and that the Respondent unreasonably failed to comply with it, taking no steps to do so. The compensatory award was therefore uplifted by 25% under s.207A TULRCA 1992. The statutory cap did not apply. The parties had agreed a basic award of £11,550, and the compensatory award was calculated at £100,113.07 net after grossing up for tax.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Respondent admitted liability before the hearing; this was a reserved judgment on remedy. Award comprises basic award of £11,550 and compensatory award of £100,113.07 (grossed up for tax). | Upheld | — | £111,663 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £111,663
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,550
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £100,113
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.123(1) ERA 1996
- Williams v Amey Services Ltd
- Rentplus
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.