Case 6014347/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Anthony Richards v Lucozade Ribena Suntory Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014347/2024
- Decision date
- 29 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Richardson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Anthony Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Anthony Richards brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Lucozade Ribena Suntory Limited. The case was heard at Southampton by CVP on 28 to 29 October 2025 before Employment Judge K Richardson.
The written judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. No other claims or remedy awards are recorded in the written decision provided.
The note to the judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure. On the face of the written record, the only adjudicated issue is dismissal of the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states only that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the record supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.