Case 6014354/2024 · Employment Tribunal
S H Kaur Landa v My Legal Claims — 2024
- Case reference
- 6014354/2024
- Decision date
- 27 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S H Kaur Landa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant’s complaint of redundancy payment. It had issued a letter dated 23 October 2024 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the redundancy pay complaint should not be struck out because it appeared from the claim that she had been employed for less than two years.
The Tribunal stated that it could not consider the claimant’s complaint that she was entitled to redundancy pay. It found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, had failed to make any sufficient representations, and had failed to request a hearing. The complaint of redundancy pay was therefore struck out.
The judgment records that the claimant’s remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing on 14 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | By letter dated 23 October 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing before striking out the redundancy pay complaint because it appeared she had been employed for less than two years. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.