Case 6014363/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Culling v Jennifer Peers — 2026
- Case reference
- 6014363/2024
- Decision date
- 23 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Culling
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 23 February 2026 warning that it was considering strike-out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 30 September 2025 and because the claim was not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not reply as required. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim and stated that the hearing listed for 5 March 2026 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not give particulars of this claim beyond the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not give particulars of this claim beyond the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not give particulars of this claim beyond the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.