Case 6014390/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ellis Carey v Electrical Power Engineering Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014390/2025
- Decision date
- 25 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ellis Carey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 September 2025, the tribunal gave Ellis Carey an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The reasons record that the hearings fixed for 8 October 2025 and 20, 21 and 22 September 2027 will not take place. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the claim and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The PDF reasons refer only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. The gov.uk listing categories for this case include disability discrimination, but the judgment text itself does not break the claims out separately. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The PDF reasons refer only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. The gov.uk listing categories for this case include unfair dismissal, but the judgment text itself does not break the claims out separately. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.