Case 6014401/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Karl Hewitt v Terrence Andrew Ltd. — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014401/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rao REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Karl Hewitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent was notified of the claim and hearing at its registered office but did not file a response or attend. The claimant was also absent. After contacting the claimant by email and waiting until 2pm, the tribunal proceeded in the absence of both parties under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed. It made no reduction for contributory conduct. The basic award was calculated at one week's gross pay for each of six complete years of employment while the claimant was aged 33 to 39, using the ET1 figure of £602.87 per week, producing £3,617.22.
The holiday pay complaint succeeded because the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. The tribunal awarded £1,947.08 on that claim, as set out in the claimant's schedule of loss. The notice pay complaint in breach of contract also succeeded, and the tribunal awarded £3,405.64 as damages. The total sum ordered was £8,969.94.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded under section 98 ERA 1996 and made no reduction for contributory conduct. It awarded a basic award only. | Upheld | — | £3,617 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent did not pay for holiday accrued but untaken at the end of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,947 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the notice pay complaint and awarded damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £3,406 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,970
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,617
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.