Case 6014403/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In-person For the v HM Plumbing and Maintenance Services Ltd and Mr J P M Jones — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014403/2024
- Decision date
- 5 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr David
- Venue
- Swansea
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In-person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant was continuously employed by the First Respondent, HM Plumbing and Maintenance Services Limited, from 1 February 2017 until his dismissal by reason of redundancy on 19 July 2024. The hearing was held at Swansea by Cloud Video Platform on 13 January 2025 before Employment Judge David Harris sitting alone; the Claimant appeared in person and there was no appearance for the Respondents.
Judgment was entered against the First Respondent in the total sum of £7,973.20 gross, comprising a redundancy payment of £3,890.25, unpaid wages of £3,490.95 gross, and unpaid holiday pay of £592.00 gross. The claim against the Second Respondent, Mr John Paul Mervyn Jones, was dismissed. Judgment was entered in the Register and copies sent to the parties on 5 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded against the First Respondent following dismissal by reason of redundancy on 19 July 2024. | Upheld | — | £3,890 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages due at the time of dismissal, gross, awarded against the First Respondent. | Upheld | — | £3,491 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay due at the time of dismissal, gross, awarded against the First Respondent. Layer 1 listed this under Working Time Regulations; the judgment treats it as holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £592 |
| Other | All claims against the Second Respondent (Mr John Paul Mervyn Jones) were dismissed. The judgment does not specify the legal basis of the claim against the Second Respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,973
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.