Case 6014470/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Dhanda v ISG Retail Limited (in administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014470/2024
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Dhanda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with its duties under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 by failing to consult properly or at all with the claimant regarding proposed redundancies.
The claimant was informed on 20 September 2024 that he was being made redundant with immediate effect along with more than 20 other employees. The tribunal made a protective award covering 90 days from 20 September 2024 to 19 December 2024, calculated by reference to a weekly wage of £1,286.54, with an award of £16,495.89.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment records a failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 by failing to consult properly or at all regarding proposed redundancies. | Upheld | — | £16,496 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,496
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.