Case 6014521/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Dzhan Kurt v Sundrax Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6014521/2024
- Decision date
- 9 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wilson
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dzhan Kurt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge L Wilson, sitting alone at Watford by CVP, heard the claim with the claimant in person and the respondent represented by Maria Bragina, Manager. The judge found that the unpaid wages claim was well-founded and that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages totalling £16,000.02 gross between January 2024 and June 2024 inclusive.
The respondent had since paid £3,690.66 of that sum, leaving a balance of £12,309.36 gross which the respondent was ordered to pay. The award differed from the £12,570 announced at the hearing because the arithmetic had been re-checked. A breach of contract claim was withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Original gross deduction was £16,000.02; respondent had paid £3,690.66 prior to judgment leaving £12,309.36 gross outstanding. Sum corrected from the £12,570 announced at hearing after re-checking arithmetic. | Upheld | — | £12,309 |
| Breach of contract | Withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and dismissed by the tribunal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,309
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.