Case 6014554/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Uddin v Birdhaus Restaurants Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014554/2024
- Decision date
- 1 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Uddin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Robinson, sitting alone at London South Employment Tribunal by video on 1 August 2025, determined the claims of Miss S Uddin against Birdhaus Restaurants Limited. The Claimant appeared in person; the Respondent did not attend. The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £817.66 as the total gross sum deducted. The Tribunal further found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay the Claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination, and ordered payment of £398.17.
The Tribunal additionally ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant two weeks' pay (£589.62) as additional compensation under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide the Claimant with a written employment contract. The Claimant's claim for notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the Tribunal's standard notice.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages; gross sum deducted ordered to be paid. | Upheld | — | £818 |
| Holiday pay | Treated by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages for failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £398 |
| Other | Additional compensation of two weeks' pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. No matching enum value; classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £590 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,805
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.