Case 6014659/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andre Munhos v TownsendRestaurant Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014659/2024
- Decision date
- 11 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rao Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andre Munhos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent was notified of the claim and the final hearing but did not file a response or attend. The tribunal therefore proceeded in the respondent’s absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. It also considered the limitation issue under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found that, although the applicable time limit expired on 3 October 2024 and the claim was presented on 10 October 2024, it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim by the deadline and he had presented it within a reasonable period afterwards.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. It accepted that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction of £2,406.42 from the claimant’s wages in the period 1 May 2024 to 4 June 2024 inclusive. It also awarded £90.65 interest at 5% for the period from 4 June 2024 to the date of hearing, making £2,497.07 payable on this head, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance due.
The tribunal also found the holiday pay complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction of £789.44 by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant’s employment ended, covering the period 19 March 2024 to 4 June 2024 inclusive. It added £29.74 interest at 5% to the date of hearing, making £819.18 payable on that head. The judgment sum due was £3,316.25 in total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for 1 May 2024 to 4 June 2024; the award included £90.65 interest. | Upheld | — | £2,497 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint for 19 March 2024 to 4 June 2024; the award included £29.74 interest. | Upheld | — | £819 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,316
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable / reasonable period thereafter
- Rule 47 ET Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.