Case 6014669/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Philip Paul v JR Motorsports Limited in creditors voluntary liquidation — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014669/2024
- Decision date
- 24 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Philip Paul
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Philip Paul was employed by JR Motorsports Limited as Quality Assurance and Stores Manager from 14 November 2021 to 5 July 2024. The respondent was in creditors voluntary liquidation and did not attend the hearing. The claimant said he was unpaid from 1 April 2024 until the end of his employment and that the respondent also failed to make employer pension contributions during that period. The respondent's response admitted arrears of pay and pension contributions and proposed a payment schedule.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. It accepted the claimant's evidence that no pay was received from 1 April 2024 to 5 July 2024, calculated the gross unpaid wages at £13,032.33 using the claimant's weekly and daily rates, and gave credit for £5,600 gross already received from the Redundancy Payments Service. The formal judgment awarded £7,432.33 for unpaid wages.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract in respect of employer pension contributions and ordered payment of £882.90. The total sum awarded by the judgment is £8,315.23. The reasons section contains a minor arithmetic inconsistency, stating £7,432.31 for wages, but the operative order awards £7,432.33.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The order at paragraph 2 awards £7,432.33 for unpaid wages. The reasons at paragraph 6 state £7,432.31, but the formal judgment sum is £7,432.33. | Upheld | — | £7,432 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded for unpaid employer pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £883 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,315
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.