Case 6014698/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Annette Fowler First v Mojo Coffee Lewes Road Limited (in liquidation) Second Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014698/2025
- Decision date
- 12 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Annette Fowler First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter at Croydon by CVP on 21 February 2025 before Employment Judge Lumby. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents did not attend.
In the written judgment, the only substantive determination was that, under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. The amount awarded was £3,252.42.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No other claims, findings, or remedy components are set out in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,252.42. | Upheld | — | £3,252 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,252
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.