Case 6014769/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Puttock v Kego Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014769/2024
- Decision date
- 17 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Puttock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Puttock worked for Kego Limited from 8 March 2024 to 25 July 2024 as a restaurant supervisor at The Freemason’s Arms in Wiswell. He said he worked full-time, five days a week, for around 40 to 45 hours per week and took no annual leave during employment, including over the Easter bank holiday weekend. The respondent filed an almost entirely blank ET3 and did not attend the hearing. The tribunal accepted the claimant’s sworn evidence and the payslip evidence he produced.
The tribunal found that the payslip dated 12 July 2024 showed some holiday pay due, but not the full amount accrued. It accepted the claimant’s evidence that Nick White was the de facto manager and that the hours information supplied to the accountants had likely under-reported the claimant’s working time. For the calculation, the tribunal assumed an average of 43 hours per week, rather than the 45 hours stated in the claim form, and found that the claimant had accrued 92.4 hours of untaken annual leave.
Applying Employment Rights Act 1996 s13 and Working Time Regulations 1998 regulations 13, 13A and 14, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to payment on termination for the accrued leave. It awarded £1,247.40 gross, calculated as 92.4 hours at £13.50 per hour. The tribunal also considered whether to make a costs order because of the respondent’s non-engagement and the text message sent by Nick White on 28 February 2025, but declined to do so because any recoverable amount would have been very small.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim pleaded and determined as unpaid wages/unlawful deductions arising from accrued but unpaid holiday pay on termination. The tribunal also referred to Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 14 and ERA 1996 s13. | Upheld | — | £1,247 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,247
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 s13
- Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 14
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13 and 13A
- Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 rule 77
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.