Case 6014856/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A. Mikova v True Ambassadors — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014856/2025
- Decision date
- 18 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A. Mikova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 18 September 2025, Employment Judge Massarella found that Mrs A. Mikova was an employee of True Ambassadors at the material time. That status finding was part of the basis for the monetary orders that followed. The case was heard by CVP at the East London Hearing Centre, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr R. Katz, solicitor.
The Tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The deductions identified were £480.90 for the January 2025 pay period, £229 for the February 2025 pay period, and £309.15 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday. Those sums were awarded to the claimant as part of the tribunal's judgment.
The Tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment. In consequence, it awarded a further £229, described in the judgment as two weeks' pay. The judgment ordered payment of the total sum of £1,248.05 without deductions of any sort. The written record notes that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages were found in respect of £480.90 for the January 2025 pay period, £229 for the February 2025 pay period, and £309.15 for accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,019 |
| Other | The Tribunal found a failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and awarded a further £229, described as two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £229 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,248
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.