Case 6014962/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C O’Hara-Lee v The Medical Warehouse Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014962/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C O’Hara-Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the claimant's name to Mr Conan O'Hara-Lee.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The Tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period October 2023 to August 2024 and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum deducted.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons are included in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and identifies the gross sum deducted. Reasons were given orally and written reasons were not included in the text. | Upheld | — | £71,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £71,667
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.