Case 6014964/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Blackmore v Lake Fabrications Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014964/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Blackmore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Blackmore brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Lake Fabrications Limited. The respondent did not attend the hearing, which took place at London South by CVP on 21 February 2025 before Employment Judge Davidson.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in June 2024 and September 2024.
The judgment records that the respondent must pay £1,988.00 in respect of June 2024 and £2,352.00 in respect of September 2024, described as the gross sums deducted. The claimant was held responsible for any tax or National Insurance arising on those sums.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in June 2024 and September 2024. It ordered payment of the gross sums deducted: £1,988.00 for June 2024 and £2,352.00 for September 2024. | Upheld | — | £4,340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,340
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.