Case 6015023/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T H Robson v Harry James Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015023/2024
- Decision date
- 23 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T H Robson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr T H Robson's claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 for unlawful deduction from wages against Harry James Group Ltd. The respondent was ordered to pay £2,539.35, the tribunal recording that this sum comprised £1,917.75 for 25 days' wages from July 2024, together with £355.20 and £266.40 in respect of employee's pension contributions.
The written record states that the award was a gross award and that the claimant would be liable to HM Revenue and Customs for any tax and national insurance due on it. The tribunal also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply to the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's s.13 Employment Rights Act claim for unlawful deduction from wages well founded and ordered payment of £2,539.35, made up of £1,917.75 for 25 days' wages from July 2024, £355.20 in respect of employee's pension contributions, and £266.40 in respect of employee's pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £2,539 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,539
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.