Case 6015066/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Norvill v North-Ply (Trading) Ltd. HELD AT/BY: Mold by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015066/2024
- Decision date
- 15 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Norvill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 9 January 2025 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan. The Claimant was absent and the Tribunal heard evidence from the Respondent. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within the judgment's stated time limit.
The Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claim that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. It also dismissed the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice of termination. No further written findings or reasoning were set out in the written record beyond those dispositions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal dismissed the claim that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal dismissed the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Respondent conceded that £300 gross holiday pay was due on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.