Case 6015082/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Rheinhard v Volac International Ltd. — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015082/2025
- Decision date
- 10 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Rheinhard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing held in Wrexham by video on 19 September 2025 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, the tribunal considered Ms C Rheinhard’s claim against Volac International Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages totalling £2,396.44. The judgment records that the claim was brought under ss 13 and 14 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal’s decision was that the claim was not well-founded, failed, and was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party; no such request was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages totalling £2,396.44, brought under ss 13 and 14 Employment Rights Act 1996, was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ss 13 & 14 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.