Case 6015117/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mx M Williams v Cloud Sounds Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015117/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mx M Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRegional Employment Judge Burgher heard the case in the respondent's absence after Cloud Sounds Limited failed to attend or respond. The claimant's claims for redundancy pay, unlawful deduction of wages, notice pay and accrued holiday pay all succeeded. The tribunal found the claimant had worked for the respondent for 5 full years and was 30 years old when dismissed. Awards comprised: £2,221.15 redundancy pay (5 x £444.23); £7,700 in unpaid wages for June to September 2024 (4 months at £1,925); £444.23 for one week's outstanding notice to 6 October 2024; £310.96 for 3.5 days accrued holiday pay (3.5 x £88.85); and £2.85 for Lloyds Bank overdraft fees, totalling £10,779.19.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | 5 years' service at £444.23 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,221 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages June to September 2024 (4 x £1,925). | Upheld | — | £7,700 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Unpaid notice (1 week) to 6 October 2024. | Upheld | — | £444 |
| Holiday pay | 3.5 days accrued holiday at £88.85/day. | Upheld | — | £311 |
| Other | Lloyds Bank overdraft fees. | Upheld | — | £3 |
| Redundancy | 5 years' service at £444.23 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,221 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages June to September 2024 (4 x £1,925). | Upheld | — | £7,700 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Unpaid notice (1 week) to 6 October 2024. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,779
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.