Case 6015145/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Jermin v AtkinsRealis UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015145/2024
- Decision date
- 23 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Jermin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Midlands West Employment Tribunal hearing on 23 May 2025, before Employment Judge Noons, the tribunal held that Mr M Jermin's claims against AtkinsRealis UK Ltd were lodged out of time. It found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claims within the statutory time limit.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claims for lack of jurisdiction. The extracted judgment does not record any separate substantive findings on the individual claim heads or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment does not distinguish the individual claim heads; it records that the claimant's claims were lodged out of time and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not distinguish the individual claim heads; it records that the claimant's claims were lodged out of time and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment does not distinguish the individual claim heads; it records that the claimant's claims were lodged out of time and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.