Case 6015157/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gharabli v Cedar Hope Care Service — 2023
- Case reference
- 6015157/2024
- Decision date
- 2 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gharabli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend a preliminary hearing on 13 June 2025. The judge identified that the complaints of gender reassignment discrimination, whistleblowing and victimisation were not made clear in the claim form, and that the further clarification provided did not show claims with reasonable prospects of success.
The tribunal ordered that those complaints would be struck out unless the claimant explained by 11 July 2025 why they should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide information in response, and the tribunal struck out those complaints under rule 38(1)(a).
The complaints of direct and indirect discrimination because of religion or belief were not dismissed. The judgment states that those complaints will proceed if the claimant actively pursues them and complies with tribunal orders.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender reassignment discrimination | The judgment states this complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out under rule 38(1)(a). | Struck out | Gender reassignment | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states this complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out under rule 38(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states this complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out under rule 38(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states the direct and indirect religion or belief discrimination complaints were not dismissed and would proceed if the claimant actively pursued them and complied with tribunal orders. | Other | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 3
- overriding objective
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.