Case 6015212/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Voyce v Mr A Ellaway — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015212/2025
- Decision date
- 20 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Voyce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Cardiff via CVP on 13 August 2025, before Employment Judge Leith, the tribunal dealt with Miss R Voyce's claims against Mr A Ellaway. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Buchanan-Shill, Consultant. Judgment was approved on 14 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 20 August 2025.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages between 1 December 2024 and 3 March 2025. It ordered the Respondent to pay the gross sum of £2,009.38, being the amounts deducted.
It also found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant for annual leave accrued but untaken on termination of her employment, and awarded £324.09 gross in respect of that holiday pay. In addition, the tribunal found that the Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars and awarded £462.98, stated to be two weeks' pay. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment was £2,796.45 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages between 1 December 2024 and 3 March 2025 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £2,009 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay for annual leave accrued but untaken on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £324 |
| Other | The tribunal found a failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars and awarded two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £463 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,796
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.