Case 6015223/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Cheri Faulkner v Network N Media — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015223/2025
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Cheri Faulkner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningCheri Faulkner's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was struck out. The tribunal said section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and found that Ms Faulkner had been employed by Network N Media for less than two years. On that basis, the tribunal held that she was not entitled to bring the complaint.
The tribunal also recorded that Ms Faulkner had been given the opportunity to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out, but she failed to do so. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The reasons say the claimant complained of constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal struck out the complaint because section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service and the claimant had less than two years' service. The judgment also states the claimant did not give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.