Case 6015339/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jacobus James Simpson v IF Finishes North West Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015339/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jacobus James Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 14 March 2025 before Employment Judge Cookson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending, the tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent had failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant’s employment ended and awarded £1,076.92, noting that the claimant was responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that sum.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 between 1 July 2024 and 16 August 2024. It further found unnotified deductions totalling £2,215.04 from the claimant’s pay in the 13 weeks before the claim form was presented and awarded that amount in respect of those deductions.
In addition, the tribunal found that when the proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It held that there were no exceptional circumstances making an award of two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, and that it was not just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay. Under section 38 Employment Act 2002, it therefore awarded £1,400. The total payable to the claimant was £4,691.96.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 in the period from 1 July 2024 to 16 August 2024. No separate monetary award was recorded for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unnotified deductions totalling £2,215.04 from the claimant's pay in the 13 weeks before presentation of the claim form and awarded that sum. | Upheld | — | £2,215 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars when proceedings began. Applying section 38 Employment Act 2002, it found no exceptional circumstances making a two weeks' gross pay award unjust or inequitable and held that a four weeks' gross pay award was not just and equitable. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended; the claimant was noted as responsible for any tax or National Insurance on this award. | Upheld | — | £1,077 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,692
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.