Case 6015351/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Edwards v Plastic Regrind Sales North East Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015351/2024
- Decision date
- 5 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that Mr T Edwards was entitled to a redundancy payment from Plastic Regrind Sales North East Ltd. The judgment records the amount of that redundancy payment as £1875.60.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint in respect of holiday pay. It found that the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,876 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,876
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.