Case 6015371/2025 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr M Ladi (2) Mr P Anelli v Forage and Season Group Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 6015371/2025
- Decision date
- 9 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr M Ladi (2) Mr P Anelli
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered Forage and Season Group Limited, the First Respondent, to pay Mr M Ladi, the First Claimant, the gross sum of £462.70. It ordered Forage and Season Core Limited, the Second Respondent, to pay Mr P Anelli, the Second Claimant, the gross sum of £860.84.
The complaints of automatic unfair dismissal and breach of contract failed and were dismissed. The tribunal also found that the Respondents had breached the duty under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide a statement of initial particulars of employment, but held that no award was due for that breach. The monetary awards recorded in the judgment total £1,323.54.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The First Respondent was ordered to pay the First Claimant this gross sum. | Upheld | — | £463 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Second Respondent was ordered to pay the Second Claimant this gross sum. | Upheld | — | £861 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes the complaints as automatic unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The Respondents breached the duty under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide a statement of initial particulars of employment, but no award was due. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,324
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.