Case 6015420/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Rankin v Croydon Health Services — 2017
- Case reference
- 6015420/2025
- Decision date
- 1 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Rankin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Croydon Health Services. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years and was therefore not entitled to bring the complaint. After the claimant did not respond to the tribunal's letter of 21 May 2025 inviting reasons why the claim should not be struck out, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out and the proceedings came to an end.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states this was the only claim and that it was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and did not respond to the tribunal's invitation to show why it should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.